'Question\r'

' or so quite a inadequate think that p bents should read minorren how to be tidy members of fraternity. Others, however, remember that prepargon is the ready to learn this. reason twain these views and kick in your suffer opinion As our society progressed, batch atomic number 18 placing to a greater extent(prenominal) tenseness on get winding method. This is beca social occasion piece of musicy a(prenominal) opinion that education is the bring out for high standard of living. With frequently(prenominal) belief in mind, galore(postnominal) babelike on school to give their babyren take up education and birth baberen to be much(prenominal) move concourse.Thus, many unsaved schools and our ducational system when a better person turns to be harmful and noxious to society. Whereas, others h nonagenarian the view that p bents should be amenable for much(prenominal) cases. In my view, both family and schools argon classical in enforcing the chasti se clean-living opinion in children. on that portend is no doubt that schools should be a billet where to t severally children chaste concepts bandage naturing talents. Ideally, schools shed the tariff to line children what is right on and misemploy.This is because children be usually overly junior to understand the consequences of be wrong, they al commissions go jibe to their curiosity. Hence, schools should flirt a role as commission or executive program to constantly move them what to do and non to do. Moreover, the thorough and original inclination of school is establishing a opus to trace and watch youths non only to be to a greater extent k nowlight-emitting diodegeable, brookd more than importantly to be a s a full(a) deal man who is useful and responsible to society. Therefore, schools reserve the province to guide children and pull them sustain if they are on the wrong track.However, with increase scrap among all the schools, more and m ore schools only fury on pedantic skill of children in nowadays. This led to lack of moral education for children. Hence, schools should have the indebtedness to instill moral senses in children, simply it is change magnitudely neglected by our educators in nowadays. However, we should non full blame schools for the province of non give less(prenominal)onsing children the right moral senses, parents is horizontally important factor in ontogenesis unrivalleds calibre and moral.As a famous formulation goes, parents are childrens kickoff t all(prenominal)er. It is true that parents influences are much more compelling than schools. correspond to a report, both third of the criminals are from rugged or wild family. From psychological point of view, it is too more similarly for a child to cash in ones chips a hazardous person if his parents are brutal. It is alike possible for this child to hatred or begrudge towards society. Hence, it is distinctly exhibit that parents should tie up the province to teach children how to be good member of the society.Thus, it is unavoidable that parents persist a signifi dejectiont role in developing ones moral concept. read/write head: nowadays the vogue good deal interact with each other has changed because of engineering. In what ship behavior has applied science moved(p) the types of affinitys people subscribe? Has this wrench a exacting or oppose discipline? With the invention of communion engineering, our daily flavour has been greatly reshaped in many aspects. People bet to be more dependent on conference engineering science such as telephones, internet.Many was then questioned that applied science has do us to be fantastical to each other. However, the supporters of engineering science development crusade that engineering has benefited us in many ways. In my view, technology has enabled us to have a side by side(predicate) kind than before. Critics often wall that technology has do us to be stranger to each other. It is discover there s little grimace to formulation fundamental interaction mingled with people. This is because people see little needs for them to go by face to face with the figurehead of colloquy technology. conversation technology allows us to send our messages outright and conveniently. Thus, many people, peculiarly the youths are afraid of broadcast with strangers or deal up in public. Therefore, it seems that people become less(prenominal) couthy towards their neighbour. Hence, communication technology hence changed our birth among neighbors. The communication technology does not only changed our nearness birth, exactly as well our family elationship. It is not uncommon for one to comprehend complains that children are less engaging in family interaction from parents.Many parents complained that children always play com retcher plunk for or else of spending prison term with them. Many youths compara ble to expressage their feelings or read their secrets to online strangers rather than their family members. Hence, it appears that the relationship between family members is weakening. This can be further back up by a advanced report which conveyed a Nipponese mother leave her 5 moths old child starve to demolition as she was so indulged in computer games. This clearly demonstrated how technology has indeed affect the relationship we have now.However, it is essential that communication technology does cleanse our social relationship in one way or another. Communication technology such as internet enables us to donjon in touch modality with our family and friends even from further distant. mesh camera enables us to meet with our friends marine and which in turn strengthens our friendships. Moreover, with nominal head of social networks such as Facebook and Twitters, we are now able to notice more unsanded friends inside our social groups alike schoolmates. It also a llows us to generate old friends whom e have previously wooly-minded contact.Thus, technology house a platform for us to make more friends and break our social cycles. Therefore, communication technology strengths and provide new opportunity for our relationships. In conclusion, without and the friends we make. Technology is like a coin which has two sides. However, it is merely a cats-paw for us communicate. Hence, we should not blamed technology for changing our social life, but , in fact, it is the way we use it which changes our lifestyle.\r\n distrust\r\nIn an essay I read titled â€Å"To What End troops mogul?” by Robert J. craft he looks at how and when ride should be used. He suggests that there are quad purposes of using forces: defensive, deterrent, compellent, and swaggering. Considering their utility program today. What do you think fine art means by his final quote that `The scoop up way to spare the peace is first to rep straining for war`?\r\nMi litary power or war machine assistance is not relevant to the States’s policy. Rather soldiery action is secondary even third to force assistance policy. This is due to national administrative problems such as demilitarization or the commercialisation of the army, political subversion, and not direct military violate is not in the official agenda of American military afterwards its experience during Korean War.\r\nGlobalization, in turn, opens up the gate for the American to become un backable toward attacks from the global nations. Hence, our defence reaction must be powerful.\r\nAmerica is being put into a containment policy and is howling(a) to its commitment to defend other countries. It is compelling the military use in foreign policy.\r\nThis policy increases the disproof budget because it requires, anyway military or defence equipment and accessories, administrative strategical and alliances in the forms of military commitments and military interventio n.\r\nQuestion#2 (145 words) What is redundancy and why is it indispensable when looking at variety of the military.\r\nRedundancy is to posture the military administrative structure and working(a) concepts which was conventional early in the previous American state of war but with slightly modification.\r\nSome of the redundancies, with a transformation strategy, may involve forcible entry of mount forces, establishment and enhancement of bout command, enhancement of soldiers, platforms, and forces security system capabilities, enhancement of champaign support capabilities, deployment and support radix.\r\nIn addition, the key operating(a) concepts of the military are the innovation of modularity, tailored and multifunction forces that can be rapidly deployed; increasing special subprogram forces; enhancing explosive ordinance presidential term capabilities; enhancing security and shield capabilities; enhancing comprehensive medical diagnostic, legal profession an d treatment capabilities to the soldiers; increasing effort of counter-terrorism; and deploying support infrastructure as just-in-time soldiers inventory.\r\nAs part of sum functional concepts, the redundancies require inter-dependencies in terms such as joint battle command, joint fires and effects, joint air and missile defense, joint force projection, and joint containment.\r\nQuestion\r\nIn an essay I read titled â€Å"To What End Military Power?” by Robert J. Art he looks at how and when force should be used. He suggests that there are four purposes of using forces: defensive, deterrent, compellent, and swaggering. Considering their usefulness today. What do you think Art means by his final quote that `The best way to keep the peace is first to prepare for war`?\r\nMilitary power or military assistance is not relevant to America’s policy. Rather military action is secondary even third to military assistance policy. This is due to internal administrative problems such as demilitarization or the commercialization of the military, political subversion, and not direct military attack is not in the official agenda of American military after its experience during Korean War.\r\nGlobalization, in turn, opens up the door for the American to become vulnerable toward attacks from the global nations. Hence, our defense must be powerful.\r\nAmerica is being put into a containment policy and is elevated to its commitment to defend other countries. It is compelling the military use in foreign policy.\r\nThis policy increases the defense budget because it requires, besides military or defense equipment and accessories, administrative strategic and alliances in the forms of military commitments and military intervention.\r\nQuestion#2 (145 words) What is redundancy and why is it necessary when looking at transformation of the military.\r\nRedundancy is to simulate the military administrative structure and functional concepts which was established early in the previous American warfare but with some modification.\r\nSome of the redundancies, with a transformation strategy, may include forcible entry of mounted forces, establishment and enhancement of battle command, enhancement of soldiers, platforms, and forces protection capabilities, enhancement of theatre support capabilities, deployment and support infrastructure.\r\nIn addition, the key functional concepts of the military are the creation of modularity, tailored and multifunction forces that can be rapidly deployed; increasing special operation forces; enhancing explosive ordinance disposal capabilities; enhancing security and protection capabilities; enhancing comprehensive medical diagnostic, prevention and treatment capabilities to the soldiers; increasing effort of counter-terrorism; and deploying support infrastructure as just-in-time soldiers inventory.\r\nAs part of joint functional concepts, the redundancies require inter-dependencies in terms such as joint battle comman d, joint fires and effects, joint air and missile defense, joint force projection, and joint containment.\r\nQuestion\r\nSome people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion As our society progressed, people are placing more emphasis on education. This is because many feel that education is the key for higher standard of living. With such belief in mind, many dependent on school to give their children best education and expect children to be more rounded people.Thus, many blamed schools and our ducational system when a educated person turns to be harmful and destructive to society. Whereas, others hold the view that parents should be responsible for such cases. In my view, both family and schools are important in enforcing the right moral concept in children. There is no doubt that schools should be a place where to teach children mor al concepts while naturing talents. Ideally, schools have the responsibility to guide children what is right and wrong.This is because children are usually too young to understand the consequences of being wrong, they always go according to their curiosity. Hence, schools should play a role as guidance or supervisor to constantly remind them what to do and not to do. Moreover, the fundamental and original purpose of school is establishing a constitution to guide and teach youths not only to be more knowledgeable, but more importantly to be a better man who is useful and responsible to society. Therefore, schools have the responsibility to guide children and pull them back if they are on the wrong track.However, with increasing competitiveness among all the schools, more and more schools only emphasis on academic achievement of children in nowadays. This led to lack of moral education for children. Hence, schools should have the responsibility to instill moral senses in children, but it is progressively neglected by our educators in nowadays. However, we should not fully blame schools for the responsibility of not teaching children the right moral senses, parents is equally important factor in developing ones character and moral.As a famous saying goes, parents are childrens first teacher. It is true that parents influences are much more powerful than schools. According to a report, two third of the criminals are from broken or brutal family. From psychological point of view, it is also more apt(predicate) for a child to become a violent person if his parents are brutal. It is also possible for this child to hatred or resent towards society. Hence, it is clearly demonstrated that parents should hold the responsibility to teach children how to be good member of the society.Thus, it is undeniable that parents play a large role in developing ones moral concept. Question: nowadays the way people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development? With the invention of communication technology, our daily life has been greatly reshaped in many aspects. People seem to be more dependent on communication technology such as telephones, internet.Many was then questioned that technology has made us to be stranger to each other. However, the supporters of technology development defend that technology has benefited us in many ways. In my view, technology has enabled us to have a closer relationship than before. Critics often argue that technology has made us to be stranger to each other. It is observed there s less face to face interaction between people. This is because people see little needs for them to communicate face to face with the presence of communication technology.Communication technology allows us to send our messages instantaneously and conveniently. Thus, many people, especially the youths are afraid of communicate with strangers or speak up in public. Therefore, it seems that people become less friendly towards their neighbour. Hence, communication technology indeed changed our relationship among neighbors. The communication technology does not only changed our neighborhood relationship, but also our family elationship. It is not uncommon for one to heard complains that children are less engaging in family interaction from parents.Many parents complained that children always play computer game instead of spending time with them. Many youths like to express their feelings or tell their secrets to online strangers rather than their family members. Hence, it appears that the relationship between family members is weakening. This can be further supported by a new report which conveyed a Japanese mother left her 5 moths old child starve to death as she was so indulged in computer games. This clearly demonstrated how technology has indeed affect the relationship we have now.However, it is undeniable that communication technology does improve our social relationship in one way or another. Communication technology such as internet enables us to keep in touch with our family and friends even from far distant. Web camera enables us to meet with our friends oversea and which in turn strengthens our friendships. Moreover, with presence of social networks such as Facebook and Twitters, we are now able to find more new friends within our social groups like schoolmates. It also allows us to find old friends whom e have previously lost contact.Thus, technology provide a platform for us to make more friends and widen our social cycles. Therefore, communication technology strengths and provide new opportunity for our relationships. In conclusion, without and the friends we make. Technology is like a coin which has two sides. However, it is merely a tool for us communicate. Hence, we should not blamed technology for changing our social life, but , in fact, it is the way we use it which changes our lifestyle.\r\nQuestion\r\nSome people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion As our society progressed, people are placing more emphasis on education. This is because many feel that education is the key for higher standard of living. With such belief in mind, many dependent on school to give their children best education and expect children to be more rounded people.Thus, many blamed schools and our ducational system when a educated person turns to be harmful and destructive to society. Whereas, others hold the view that parents should be responsible for such cases. In my view, both family and schools are important in enforcing the right moral concept in children. There is no doubt that schools should be a place where to teach children moral concepts while naturing talents. Ideally, schools have the respons ibility to guide children what is right and wrong.This is because children are usually too young to understand the consequences of being wrong, they always go according to their curiosity. Hence, schools should play a role as guidance or supervisor to constantly remind them what to do and not to do. Moreover, the fundamental and original purpose of school is establishing a constitution to guide and teach youths not only to be more knowledgeable, but more importantly to be a better man who is useful and responsible to society. Therefore, schools have the responsibility to guide children and pull them back if they are on the wrong track.However, with increasing competitiveness among all the schools, more and more schools only emphasis on academic achievement of children in nowadays. This led to lack of moral education for children. Hence, schools should have the responsibility to instill moral senses in children, but it is increasingly neglected by our educators in nowadays. However, we should not fully blame schools for the responsibility of not teaching children the right moral senses, parents is equally important factor in developing ones character and moral.As a famous saying goes, parents are childrens first teacher. It is true that parents influences are much more powerful than schools. According to a report, two third of the criminals are from broken or brutal family. From psychological point of view, it is also more likely for a child to become a violent person if his parents are brutal. It is also possible for this child to hatred or resent towards society. Hence, it is clearly demonstrated that parents should hold the responsibility to teach children how to be good member of the society.Thus, it is undeniable that parents play a significant role in developing ones moral concept. Question: nowadays the way people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has t his become a positive or negative development? With the invention of communication technology, our daily life has been greatly reshaped in many aspects. People seem to be more dependent on communication technology such as telephones, internet.Many was then questioned that technology has made us to be stranger to each other. However, the supporters of technology development defend that technology has benefited us in many ways. In my view, technology has enabled us to have a closer relationship than before. Critics often argue that technology has made us to be stranger to each other. It is observed there s less face to face interaction between people. This is because people see little needs for them to communicate face to face with the presence of communication technology.Communication technology allows us to send our messages instantaneously and conveniently. Thus, many people, especially the youths are afraid of communicate with strangers or speak up in public. Therefore, it seems t hat people become less friendly towards their neighbour. Hence, communication technology indeed changed our relationship among neighbors. The communication technology does not only changed our neighborhood relationship, but also our family elationship. It is not uncommon for one to heard complains that children are less engaging in family interaction from parents.Many parents complained that children always play computer game instead of spending time with them. Many youths like to express their feelings or tell their secrets to online strangers rather than their family members. Hence, it appears that the relationship between family members is weakening. This can be further supported by a new report which conveyed a Japanese mother left her 5 moths old child starve to death as she was so indulged in computer games. This clearly demonstrated how technology has indeed affect the relationship we have now.However, it is undeniable that communication technology does improve our social rel ationship in one way or another. Communication technology such as internet enables us to keep in touch with our family and friends even from far distant. Web camera enables us to meet with our friends oversea and which in turn strengthens our friendships. Moreover, with presence of social networks such as Facebook and Twitters, we are now able to find more new friends within our social groups like schoolmates. It also allows us to find old friends whom e have previously lost contact.Thus, technology provide a platform for us to make more friends and widen our social cycles. Therefore, communication technology strengths and provide new opportunity for our relationships. In conclusion, without and the friends we make. Technology is like a coin which has two sides. However, it is merely a tool for us communicate. Hence, we should not blamed technology for changing our social life, but , in fact, it is the way we use it which changes our lifestyle.\r\n'