Problems of Conducting Research Into the Causes of Stress Essay

wholeness product line when carry oning research into the causes of fury is the generalization of the examine. if the model is curtail this has restrictions in footings of generalizing the consequences to the entire population. In the survey by Johansson. a sample of merely 24 produceers was used and from a specific occupation type. This sample is unthinking of all occupation types and is excessively little to be applicable to the general population. Decisions made may merely be relevant to this sample. moreover it could be argued that the factors that cause emphasis in occupations such as deadlines and the dependance of others on you atomic number 18 common in all types of occupations and hence utilizing a sample of the specific occupation type becomes less restricted and applicable to other people in occupations with common stressors. A 2nd trouble when carry oning research into causes of emphasis is the cogency of measurings.Cogency refers to whether the consequences m easure what they ar supposed to mensurate and this is frequently affected by the research method. The ego champaign method is frequently questioned in footings of cogency as participants boast the ability to give socially desirable replies and maneuver off from the truth. In the survey by Kanner. questionnaires were posted out to participants and a Hassles and uplifts gradational panel was asked to be completed every month for 9 months and the Berkman life events graduated table after 10 months. This survey. due to the usage of self study deficiencies in cogency. as researches are diffident as to whether informations obt ained reflects the true sentiments of participants. which is an yield when seeking to use to mundane life. However the self study method is multipurpose. despite it missing in cogency.It gives participants the freedom to compose about their ain subjective feelings and due to emphasize being separately perceived otherwise. it is utile in orienting interventio n to persons to run into their demands. A 3rd job is reductionism. surveies frequently cut down many factors that cause an single emphasis to one factor. such as in the instance of Johansson survey. it was concluded work was the beginning of emphasis. However single factors such as personality could laugher a function. research workers do non cognize that emphasis prone persons are more likely to be in a high profess occupation. By neglecting to take into history other factors. resources and clip may be used in the incorrect country. However reductionism is utile as it does get word an country that causes emphasis and allows in-depth research to be carried out to assist participants.