Claudius, hateful villain or good king? Essay

Claudius makes a superb king. He is a careful ruler and a loving husband, providing perceptual constancy for both his country and wife. Murderer of the effectiveful king, Claudius is the hunt downs hateful, untruth villain. What justification is there in the text to support these two experiences? What is your t hazardual sensation of the way Shakespeare presents Claudius? Claudius is cap able of becoming an sound king. However his choice to exercise his newly found agent for personal gain contradicts the inviolable he attempts to accomplish. An effective king has to be an h cardinalst king. Unfortunately Claudius seems unable to be honest to any person through the course of the play.His act of finish off and his claim to the throne reflects a self promoting character for the hearing. Claudius however is able to be honest with God. finished his act of repent Claudius shows to the audience that he is able to be truthful and it also shows that he is able to detect right from wrong. Claudius details, in Act Three Scene Three, that his offence is sheer(a) and he wishes it to be pardoned in companionship for him to progress as an effective king. This honest act shows that Claudius is willing to admit when he is wrong, he whitethorn also be afraid of the afterlife and what awaits him.This unkn consume becomes apart of the larger theme of uncertainty. Claudius is capable of telling the truth, still only when it is to his advantage. In act four scene five, when Laertes blames Claudius for the death of his father, Claudius manipu of lates the situation by telling Laertes that he will help to exact his revenge. Claudius is therefore able to get unloose of both Laertes and Hamlet who both pose a threat to the power that Claudius has gained. Claudius ability to square up the operose situation and rework it to his advantage, stands him in good stead for the leadership a king exerts on his country when face with difficult situations.In this scene Claud ius outrageously refers to the divinity doth hedge a king, this is ironic considering he was able to so easily murder his own pal, yet this white lie sows a seed in Laertes heading that attempting to kill Claudius would be bad judgement on his part. The continuing communication allows Laertes to find a person to take the revenge he seeks to deliver. Claudius, already plotting to murder Hamlet, is able to give the task to Laertes, thus relieving Claudius of spilling anymore split onto his own hands, yet still dealing with the situation he finds threatening to the perceptual constancy of his crown.His use of manipulation through his use of language mimics the motif of pouring poison into his brothers ears, by talking good deal into his way of thinking Claudius is metaphorically pouring poison into lots ears. In this scene we can see the talent that Claudius harbours that would make him a good stable king conversely we also see that he puts these talents to bad use causing him to be the plays hateful, manufacture villain. Hamlet believes that Claudius is the murderer of the rightful king.In Hamlets premiere soliloquy, Hamlet refers to his father so excellent a king, that was to this. His mental picture that Claudius is not the rightful king that should provide benefit for the state, before his fathers ghost informs him of his murderous attributes, allows the audience to see that in the eyes of those that love the late King Hamlet, Claudius is no comparison to the leadership that was shown by his predecessor. The late King Hamlet was a man who charged into battle gird at point, exactly cap-a-pie as described by Horatio in act one scene two.However it can be argued that this works in Claudius favour. The previous king used violence to bring order through battle he would start put other peoples lives at risk for his reputation and ego. Claudius uses communication between countries to resolve any problems that exist. We see this in (I cant find it but I am quite sure it happens somewhere, hopefully I would have found it by the time we meet. In the section Im looking for some people is discussing the coming battle or something equivalent that, but it makes out that Claudius is talking to the other country.) Hamlets view can be a result of anger for his mothers remarriage, or the death and replacement of his father. If his view stems from this then the audience is asked to define whether they believe Claudius is doing a better job at protecting his country, and providing stableness for it. Claudius provides stability for his country and wife only for the short term. His record of underhandedness leaves him under fire(predicate) to attack if anyone were to find out. Through this attack Claudius would be left compromising for the public and other countries to remove his crown.From Claudius bad decision to remove his brother from power he has created a screw up character that is leading the state. Through one action Claudius is f orced to cover his tracks, by covering his tracks of one foul deed he must commit another. He attempts to right what is wrong and in doing so he allows the stakes to be raised(a) significantly. If he does not hide his mistakes then he will sure as shooting be found out, by attempting to hide them, he runs the risk of existence found out but can ultimately get forward with it.We see that Claudius is upset with his actions when he pleads for religion to cure him of his life at the alter, he asks for forgiveness. Claudius is not the legitimate king, and therefore automatically takes the place of the plays hateful, lying villain. The addition of his murderous attributes makes it hard for any audience member to connect with the thought behind Claudius actions. Hes seen as a cold murderer that only acts for himself.Contrary to popular belief I believe that Claudius is a man who tempted one day made, a very bad decision. Through his human instinct for survival he has become a corrupt k ing that originally wanted surface for his country. We see his remorse when he kneels at the alter for forgiveness. He provides stability for the short term but not ultimately. Claudius has the ability to become a great king, but has tainted his chances with the murder of his brother, causing him to become the corrupt villain that audiences see him as.