The Misunderstanding of Internet Freedom

The Misunderstanding of profit independence The public validation has been a significant part of every(prenominal) system. slew as citizens always discuss their opinions with each other. In consistency with the system which they argon ruled, their discussions keep back an effect on the rules and regulations of the reinment. In rude(a)-fashioned societies which embrace democracy as management system, the influence of public finis is predominant. As it is mentioned above sharing and declaring public decision is the milestone of governance in such societies.Therefore, the more advanced ways populate have to go by, the more they can contribute to the improvement of democracy. If it is compared with the past, flock have faster, cheaper and a great deal more effective communication tools in parliamentary law to exchange and mete out their ideas. The meshwork and new communication technologies c wholly down democracy by qualification any kind of information glide pathib le and by providing people with quick and cheap communication. The Internet en sufficients the improvement of democracy beca workout it gives people the opportunity to be aware of current issues. It offers a wide range of information to everyone careless(predicate) of their status.People who are interested in a topic can access plenty of data well-nigh what they are looking for. It is not anymore the case that people have to delve into books in libraries in order to find a useful resource which contains relevant information. People already have a well-organized library which searches and introduces them to the most appropriate information on their subjects The Internet. In addition to individuals, many non-governmental organizations and any other social groups that plowshare common ideas can publish their arguments and spread them across the world.For example, human rights organizations use the Internet to advocate their arguments. L. Pal reveals that the international human ri ghts movement has braggart(a) hugely since the 1950s when approximately 38 non-go0vernmental organizations were identifiable, to around 14,500 by 1994 (qtd. Brophy and Halpin 353). The new ICTs (information and communication technologies) and the Internet provide people with advanced opportunity to agree their opinions and to contribute to democracy.To illustrate, (International Center for Human Rights and Democratic Development) ICHRDD started to use electronic publications and participated in the PeaceNet Human Rights gopher service that retrieve important data produce by other organizations (354). The information becomes accessible to all concerned workers and volunteers so that they will be more sophisticated in their fights and they are able to defend their arguments. (Brophy and Halpin 356). The new information communication technologies (ICTs) and the Internet contribute to ripening of democracy because they facilitate communication with rapid and cheap tools such as e-ma ils.It is stated by Brophy and Halpin that Electronic communications and networking cut by the barriers of date and distance, facilitating the finding of information in a way previously impossible. (353). in addition to the authors statement, instead of costly phone calls or even more cramped face to face meetings, electronic communications enable people to communicate or exchange their ideas in a rapid way whether they are at the opposite sides of the world. ICTs help citizens to contribute to democracy because they make militarisation of people more effective and cheaply.They to a fault provide circulation of information through networks, and they strengthen NGOs so that capacity of governmental agencies is limited (Brophy and Halpin 354). As it is mentioned above, ICTs enhance contributions of citizens to democracy because they transform people into aware, active and investigative elements of democracy. They enable people to discuss and question conviction, and come up with new perspectives and creative resolutions. Inherently, there are people who deny the contribution of the Internet freedom to democracy.It is besides argued that the Internet makes things worse in terms of liberalization. Evgeny Morozov who is an expert on fundamental interaction of digital technologies and democracy believes that authoritarian governments hinder democracy from developing by censoring the Internet or attacking web-sites (1). Besides, there are just about governments that censor web-sites which advocate child abuse, cyber-crimes, and terrorism (Ash 8). They also legally or illegally gain access to e-mail account, spy on searches and so on (Ash 7).These examples might seem to be assaults on privacy or obstacles to the improvement of democracy. But your privacy is not more important than the welfare of your country and children. You cannot jeopardize your country and children while some terrorists threaten benefits, security, and saving of your country or pedophile s abuse your children physically or psychologically. It should be favored to protect your country and your children to your privacy. As a result, it is legitimate and reasonable to stop over websites like this.Besides, the reliability of governments is controversial. Everybody might not be satisfied about governments implementations. However, the ones who elect the government are the majority of society. People are given the right to choose the people who will govern them. Of course, they can question the practices and submit their thoughts through NGOs and so on. But they should also be respectful to the will of the public. In conclusion, the role of public in governance is significant in all modern democracies.The more people declare their thoughts the more they can contribute to democracy. With the developing technologies and the Internet, people are more likely to communicate, exchange ideas and search for what they need. New ICTs such as e-mails and electronic documents enabl e people to enhance democracy. On the other hand, in order to prevent illegitimate censoring and regulations by governments, we should implement all laws in the online world as well. Finally, we should use our right to elect cleverly and declare our views through NGOs in an appropriate way.References Ash, Timothy Garton. Internet Freedom. freespeechdebate. com. N. D. Web. October 2012. Brophy, Peter, and Edward Halpin. Through the Net to freedom information, the Internet and human rights. jis. sagepub. com. Journal of info Science. 24 March 1999. Web. October 2012. Morozov, Evgeny, and Joanne J. Myers. The Net Delusion The dark side of Internet freedom. Carnegiecouncil. org. Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs. 25 January 2011. Web. October 2012.