.

Tuesday, June 4, 2019

An Effect of Mood-induced Emotions on Forgetting

An Effect of Mood-induced Emotions on ForgettingAn effect of mood-induced emotions on forgetting non-retrieved individualised autobiographic memoriesDemet AyAbstractRetrieval-induced forgetting (RIF) exit be investigated with stirred up actual. Autobiographical entrepot as a significant for presented proto type gains importance in terms of its emotional comp whizznt. There atomic number 18 moot findings intimately effect of emotional valence on RIF effect between psychological upset people and control group. While having inhibitory deficit disorder top executive be related to less RIF effect for invalidating stimulus, present study also aims to find positivity bias toward emotional component autobiographic memory board.Keywords Retrieval-induced forgetting, emotion, autobiographical memoryAn effect of mood-induced emotions on forgetting non-retrieved personal autobiographical memoriesMoods attain an influence on several psychological construct homogeneous verbal pr oletariat cognitive process (Gray, 2001), false memories (Storbeck Clore, 2005). A nonher crucial thing that mood impact on is what we remember (Blix Brennen, 2012) and forget (Bauml Kuhbandner, 2007) from our previous(prenominal).Not only remembering events from ones personal life however also the fact that which memories and in what ways are forgotten gain importance in recent years (Barnier, Hung, Conway, 2004). Forgetting specific events from our past can be either intentionally or unintentionally, as it names suggested directed forgetting and recovery-induced forgetting, respectively (Barnier et al., 2004).Retrieval-induced forgetting (RIF) is firstly investigated by Anderson, Bjork, and Bjork (1994). They define the problem of forgetting not in terms of capacity or real forgetting problem but accessibility problem because of retrieving some of items to a greater extent than the others. To test which items not to be retrieved, they use retrieval-induced paradigm in which is composed of three special phase. In the original version of paradigm, they use word and associative cues such as fruit, vegetables, or car brands. Participants are first capable to word pairs with specific cue and then they are shown half of items from one of the presented cue and then tested to retrieve all items. consistent finding for different material among several studies show that practicing particular item inhibits sharing cue item therefore it is less likely remembered than unpracticed form (Murayama, Miyatsu, Buchli, Storm, 2014, for review). RIF effect has been demonstrated for different materials such as lexical cues (Bajo, Gomez-Ariza, Fernandez, Marful, 2006), pictures (Ford et al., 2004), videos (Miguelez Garcia-Bajos, 2007) and so forth.Effect of emotion on retrieval-induced forgetting has two main questions (Bauml, Pasttter, Hanslmayr, 2010). First is most current emotional state of participants. Retrieval practice of either positive or neutral emotion- induced participants tend to forget more non-practiced and shared cue items than disallow mood induced participants (Bauml, Pasttter, Hanslmayr, 2010 Bauml and Kuhbandner, 2007). Bauml and Kuhbandner (2007) find empirical evidence for negative state effect in which exposing negative mood during retrieval practice results in lacking of inhibition. Therefore, they remember more non-practice material from practiced category.Neither emotional material nor autobiographical memory gain rather little attendance but Barnier and his colleagues (2004) are firstly attempted to use ones personal memory as a material for RIF paradigm recently. However, there are controversial findings or so an effect of mood on unintentional forgetting resulting from retrieval practice. For example, Barnier and his colleagues (2004) find that participants tend only to forget neutral stimulus, words, rather than emotional positive and negative one when they manipulate participants reported autobiographical me mory as positive, neutral, and negative. In other words, retrieval-induced forgetting effect occurs only for neutral stimulus. Another consistent finding about remembering or forgetting emotional stimuli and investigating durability of each stimuli show similar results with above mentioned experiment (Kuhbandner, Bauml, Stiedl, 2009). However, Harris, Sharman, Barnier, and Moulds (2010) find positivity bias toward emotional material of autobiographical memory with dysphoric patients. Hauer and Wessel (2006) also find consistently positivity bias in which means remembering more positive memory than negative memory with an addition of classic RIF effect in their first experiment.Since RIF effect is considered as resulting from inhibition (see Storm Levy, 2012, for review), examining the effect for people who have mood-induced disorders like post-traumatic underline disorder (posttraumatic stress disorder, Amir, Badour, Freese, 2009) and major depression (Groome Sterkaj, 2010) is crucial to investigate effect of mood on RIF effect. Amir and his colleagues (2009) implement the paradigm to PTSD group and either non-trauma exposed group or trauma exposed group. They find the difference between both of control groups and PTSD group in a way that PTSD patients cannot have an ability to inhibit irrelevant material so they do not demonstrate RIF effect.In line with this background, elicited autobiographical memories by participants with esteem to each emotion-induced words getting from PANAS (Watson, Clark, Tellegen, 1988) exit be used as manipulation across participants and it will hypothesized that memories included negativity will be more impacted from RIF effect based on Harris and colleagues (2010) and Wessel and Hauer (2006) findings. Dependent variable of presented study will be the fact that which material will be remembered and which of them will not be retrieved. Further analysis will be made in terms of emotional ingredients of each emotion. Since po pulation attending this experiment does not have any mood-related disorder, lack of inhibition for positivity will be less expected.MethodParticipantsParticipants will be recruited from Yeditepe University psychology undergraduate students by the flyer. Mean hop on of them will be most probably in between nineteen and twenty-two. Each participants report their past history about the fact that whether they experience mood-related disorder in any part of their life. No one reports such experience. And none of the participants have taken memory course since then. Informed consent will be taken from them and they will be debriefed about an aim of the experiment at the end.MaterialsModified version of retrieval-induced paradigm which is investigated by Anderson and his colleagues (1994) will be used in this experiment. Modification was made by Barnier and his colleagues (2004) in order to make it applicable to autobiographical memory. In terms of this procedure, participants own past m emory that is elicited by them will be used as material. They are willing to report memory in terms of emotional words not just like happy or sad but further higher-order emotions like shame and guilty. Since there are extreme controversies about theory of emotion (Ortony Turner, 1990), affective statements in positive and negative affect scale (PANAS, Watson et al., 1988) in the context of Turkish statements (Genz, 2000) will be used as category-cue. Turkish version of scale is consisted of twenty affective statement, ten is closed to positive remaining is closed to negative emotional statements, and each participants will be required to elicit a memory for each emotion-included words. These memories will be used as a material for retrieval-induced paradigm. For control condition, each participant will also elicit two memories in terms of give no valence random word. Since I have enough number of participants, differences between these random words will not be a problem.ProcedureE xperiment will consist of four distinct phase based on Barnier and his colleagues (2004) experiment in which firstly investigate autobiographical memory in the RIF paradigm. Elicitation phase will involve that memories will be recorded for each participants orally by using audio recorder. Participants will be required to answer five wh- questions specifically. These recording will be transferred into written type by blind people. Rest of the experiment will be conducted a week after from elicitation phase. Deception will take place by saying the fact that an aim of the experiment is to investigate emotional valence of past memories of university students. Learning phase of the experiment will take place individually. Each participant will be shown their own memories elicited a week ago. During retrieval practice phase participants will be half of either exposed to closed-to-positive valence words memory or feebleness versa randomly. Name of each variable will be used as Anderson and his colleagues (1994) used. At the final phase of the classic retrieval-induced paradigm, each participant will be asked to retrieve all memories. At the end, emotional intensity of each category cue and elicited memories will be collected by 5 type likert scale.Expected resultsIn the first place, relative emotional intensity among each triggered words will be rated to participants by five likert-type scale by attributing 1 to extremely negative valence and 5 to extremely positive valence after experimental paradigm will be done. Furthermore, relative emotional intensity of each autobiographical memory will also be rated by participants.Results will be expected in a way that hypothesis is constructed. serial of one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) will be used to test hypothesis. To begin with, randomly assigned elicited memories in terms of category cue will be manipulated. Each cue will be analyzed within themselves.Finally, closed-to-positive and closed-to-negative memories (10 for each) will be compared to each other. Positivity bias will also be expected consistent with Hauer and Wessel (2006) finding.DiscussionRetrieval-induced forgetting can be said that it has functional importance in terms of different situations such as psychological disorders (Amir et al., 2009). They found lack of inhibition for negative emotional material in PTSD patients. This finding suggests that if neurological basis of RIF can be faithfully investigated then PTSD can be figured out by this method. Present study also aims to find specific effect of emotional autobiographical memory on inhibition in which is regarded most probably as reason for RIF (Storm Levy, 2012).Investigating an effect of emotion on any construct is one of the hardest but crucial questions. Result of this experiment will give rise to further questions into the field in a way that how each specific emotion-included material affects unintentional forgetting for people.Neurological basis of the RIF as a p henomenon is recently investigated with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI, Kuhl, Dudukovich, Kahn, Wagner, 2007), and electrophysiological methods (Hellerstedt Johansson, 2014). According to Johansson and his colleagues (2007), ERP studies should shed light first potential correlates of ERP with regard to RIF, and inhibitory mechanisms with regard to individual differences on RIF scores. Further studies about neurological basis of RIF should be accounted for possible specific location energizing during retrieval practice in terms of emotional content of the material. I expect special amygdala activation during retrieval practice when negative-correlated stimulus is presented.Reference heelAmir, N., Badour, C. L., Freese, B. (2009). The effect of retrieval on recall of information in individuals with posttraumatic stress disorder.Journal of anxiety disorders,23(4), 535-540.Anderson, M. C., Bjork, R. A., Bjork, E. L. (1994). Remembering can cause forgetting retrieval dy namics in long-run memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, entrepot, and Cognition,20(5), 1063.Bajo, M. T., Gmez-Ariza, C. J., Fernandez, A., Marful, A. (2006). Retrieval-induced forgetting in perceptually driven memory tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(5), 1185.Barnier, A., Hung, L., Conway, M. (2004). Retrievalinduced forgetting of emotional and unemotional autobiographical memories.Cognition and Emotion,18(4), 457-477.Buml, K. H., Kuhbandner, C. (2007). Remembering can cause forgettingbut not in negative moods.Psychological Science,18(2), 111-115.Buml, K. H., Pasttter, B., Hanslmayr, S. (2010). Binding and inhibition in episodic memoryCognitive, emotional, and neural processes. Neuroscience Biobehavioral Reviews, 34(7), 1047-1054.Blix, I., Brennen, T. (2012). Retrieval-induced forgetting after trauma A study with victims of sexual assault.Cognition emotion,26(2), 321-331.Ford, R. M., Keating, S., Patel, R. (2004). Retrievalinduced forgetting A developmental study. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 22(4), 585-603.Genz, T. (2000). Positive and interdict Affect Schedule A study of validity and reliability. Trk Psikoloji Dergisi.Gray, J. R. (2001). Emotional modulation of cognitive control Approachwithdrawal states double-dissociate spatial from verbal two-back task performance.Journal of Experimental Psychology General,130(3), 436.Harris, C. B., Sharman, S. J., Barnier, A. J., Moulds, M. L. (2010). Mood and retrievalinduced forgetting of positive and negative autobiographical memories.Applied Cognitive Psychology,24(3), 399-413.Hauer, B. J., Wessel, I. (2006). Retrievalinduced forgetting of autobiographical memory details.Cognition Emotion,20(3-4), 430-447.Hellerstedt, R., Johansson, M. (2014). Electrophysiological correlates of competitor activation predict retrieval-induced forgetting.Cerebral Cortex,24(6), 1619-1629.Kuhbandner, C., Buml, K. H., Stiedl, F. C. (2009). Retrieval -induced forgetting of negative stimuli The role of emotional intensity.Cognition and Emotion,23(4), 817-830.Kuhl, B. A., Dudukovic, N. M., Kahn, I., Wagner, A. D. (2007). Decreased demands on cognitive control reveal the neural processing benefits of forgetting.Nature neuroscience,10(7), 908-914.Murayama, K., Miyatsu, T., Buchli, D., Storm, B. C. (2014). Forgetting as a present moment of retrieval A meta-analytic review of retrieval-induced forgetting. Psychological bulletin,140(5), 1383.Ortony, A., Turner, T. J. (1990). Whats basic about basic emotions?. Psychological review,97(3), 315.Storbeck, J., Clore, G. L. (2005). With Sadness Comes Accuracy With Happiness, False Memory Mood and the False Memory Effect.Psychological Science,16(10), 785-791.Storm, B. C., Levy, B. J. (2012). A progress report on the inhibitory account of retrieval-induced forgetting.Memory cognition,40(6), 827-843.Watson, D., Clark, L. A., Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measur es of positive and negative affect the PANAS scales.Journal of personality and social psychology,54(6), 1063.

No comments:

Post a Comment